<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Latest House of Commons News | Cottenham News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/tag/house-of-commons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>All the News, One Place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Diane Abbott Questions Keir Starmer on Peter Mandelson&#8217;s Appointment</title>
		<link>https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/diane-abbott/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keir Starmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership scrutiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Mandelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security vetting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Politics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/diane-abbott/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Diane Abbott has raised serious questions about Keir Starmer's decision-making regarding Peter Mandelson's appointment as ambassador to the US.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/diane-abbott/">Diane Abbott Questions Keir Starmer on Peter Mandelson&#8217;s Appointment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane Abbott&#8217;s recent criticism of Keir Starmer highlights a significant concern regarding the vetting process for high-profile government appointments. On April 20, 2026, during a session in the House of Commons, Abbott questioned why Starmer did not ensure that Peter Mandelson had passed security vetting before his controversial appointment as ambassador to the United States. This inquiry underscores a broader scrutiny of leadership decisions within the Labour Party.</p>
<p>Starmer admitted that he was not informed that Mandelson had failed the Foreign Office vetting process prior to his appointment. This revelation is particularly troubling given that Mandelson has a history—he was fired from government twice before being considered for this ambassadorial role. The implications of such an oversight raise serious questions about the judgment exercised by senior party officials.</p>
<p>Following these disclosures, Starmer took decisive action by sacking Olly Robbins, the top civil servant in the Foreign Office. This move indicates an acknowledgment of missteps within the vetting process. Despite this, the appointment of Mandelson continues to attract criticism from various MPs, suggesting that doubts about Starmer’s leadership are far from resolved.</p>
<p>Abbott, known as the &#8220;Mother of the House&#8221; for being the longest-serving female MP in Commons history, articulated her concerns sharply: &#8220;It’s one thing to say, as he [Starmer] insists on saying, ‘Nobody told me, nobody told me anything&#8230; The question is, why didn’t the prime minister ask?&#8221; Her remarks reflect a growing sentiment among party members who are questioning not only individual appointments but also the overall decision-making framework within the party.</p>
<p>In response to these mounting criticisms, Starmer remarked that &#8220;many will find these facts to be incredible.&#8221; He further expressed disbelief over how critical information could be withheld from senior ministers throughout this timeline. This statement illustrates not just an internal conflict but also potential vulnerabilities in governance and transparency at high levels of leadership.</p>
<p>The ongoing scrutiny surrounding Mandelson&#8217;s appointment has led to a ripple effect within party dynamics. It has prompted discussions about accountability and trust in leadership roles. Furthermore, it raises essential questions about how future appointments will be handled and whether similar oversights can be avoided going forward.</p>
<p>Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes to policies or procedures that might arise from this controversy. However, it is clear that Abbott’s concerns resonate with many who are watching closely how Starmer navigates this challenging situation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/diane-abbott/">Diane Abbott Questions Keir Starmer on Peter Mandelson&#8217;s Appointment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zarah Sultana Suspended from House of Commons for Five Days</title>
		<link>https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/zarah-sultana/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keir Starmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Hoyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zarah Sultana]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/zarah-sultana/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zarah Sultana faced a five-day suspension from the House of Commons following her refusal to withdraw comments labeling Keir Starmer a liar.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/zarah-sultana/">Zarah Sultana Suspended from House of Commons for Five Days</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zarah Sultana was suspended from the House of Commons for five days on April 20, 2026. This action came after she refused to withdraw her statement that Labour leader Keir Starmer is a &#8216;bare-faced liar&#8217;. The Speaker of the House, Lindsay Hoyle, ordered her to leave the chamber during a session.</p>
<p>The immediate consequence of Sultana&#8217;s suspension is the loss of pay during this period. This marks a significant disciplinary action, as it is relatively rare for MPs to face such penalties. In fact, the last MPs to be suspended were Alba Party members Neale Hanvey and Kenny MacAskill in July 2022.</p>
<p>Sultana&#8217;s refusal to retract her statement highlights a growing tension within UK politics. She argued that she had a duty to tell the truth—an assertion made as she attempted to interject while being asked to leave. The phrase &#8216;gaslighting the nation&#8217; was also used by Sultana when discussing the Prime Minister&#8217;s actions.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Lee Anderson, a fellow MP, was also removed from the House on similar grounds for calling the Prime Minister a liar. This suggests that there is an increasing intolerance for accusations of dishonesty in parliamentary discourse.</p>
<p>Under Parliamentary protocol, MPs are not permitted to accuse one another of lying without withdrawing such comments. This rule aims to maintain decorum and respect within the chamber. However, with tensions running high among party lines, such accusations are becoming more frequent.</p>
<p>Reactions from political figures have been mixed. While some support Sultana’s right to express herself, others argue that such behavior undermines parliamentary integrity. As discussions continue about accountability and truth in politics, this incident serves as a flashpoint for ongoing debates about free speech versus decorum.</p>
<p>Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential long-term repercussions for Sultana beyond this suspension. The implications of her remarks may reverberate throughout her political career and party dynamics.</p>
<p>This incident underscores not only individual accountability but also broader issues within UK politics—issues that may influence public perception and voter sentiment in upcoming elections.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/zarah-sultana/">Zarah Sultana Suspended from House of Commons for Five Days</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
