The Skinny Food Co has launched a High Court claim against B&M, seeking nearly £14 million in damages. The legal proceedings commenced in February 2023, following allegations that Skinny was removed from B&M’s supplier list on two occasions, in 2021 and 2025.

According to court filings, the initial de-listing allegedly occurred after investment talks between Skinny and B&M fell through. Skinny claims total losses from both de-listings amount to at least £16.85 million, with orders from B&M plummeting from £10.7 million in the year ending August 2021 to approximately £3.2 million the following year.

In June 2025, B&M formally notified Skinny that it would remove all remaining products by December 2025, a decision that followed the cessation of new Skinny product additions to B&M’s shelves from 2023. Skinny had invested over £235,000 in new machinery to meet expected demand from B&M, further exacerbating its financial losses.

Robin Arora, a key figure in the negotiations, allegedly made threatening remarks during discussions, with George Spalton KC stating, “B&M’s decision to de-list Skinny was motivated at least by the breakdown of the negotiations between (Mr Arora) and Skinny in respect of the proposed investment by the Arora family in Skinny, and by (Mr Arora’s) desire to make good his threat to ‘ruin’ Skinny.”

Arora himself remarked, “He was ‘the only person that can make or break your business'” and further stated, “He was able to ruin Skinny’s business if he wanted to.” These comments have raised eyebrows as the lawsuit unfolds.

As of now, B&M has yet to submit its defense in the ongoing case. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for both companies, particularly as they navigate their commercial relationship, which began in late 2020.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps in the legal proceedings, but the stakes are high as both parties prepare for what could be a lengthy court battle.

The post Skinny Food B&M Lawsuit Seeks £14 Million in Damages appeared first on cottenhamnews.

XL bullies were banned in the UK in 2024 due to a string of concerning attacks that raised public safety alarms. This ban has become increasingly relevant following the tragic incident involving 84-year-old John McColl, who died from injuries sustained during an attack by an XL bully.

The attack occurred on February 24 last year at approximately 18:00 GMT, and the dog involved, named Toretto, was subsequently shot 10 times by police marksmen to subdue it. Sean Garner, the dog’s owner, is currently on trial for owning a dog that caused injury while dangerously out of control.

Garner claims that McColl released Toretto from a shed before the attack, asserting that the dog’s behavior had been ‘brilliant’ and ‘perfect’ around other dogs and people. However, the circumstances surrounding the incident have raised significant concerns about dog ownership regulations, particularly as Garner had not informed his landlord about owning two XL bullies and one micro bully.

In light of the attack, the kennel owner has reported an alarming increase in dog bites during holiday periods, indicating a broader issue with dangerous dog breeds. The kennel houses some of the UK’s most dangerously out of control dogs, and the implications of this incident are prompting calls for stricter regulations.

Garner had owned Toretto for about four-and-a-half years, and his statements reflect a desire to improve his life through dog ownership. However, the tragic outcome of this case highlights the potential dangers associated with certain breeds and the responsibilities of owners.

As the trial progresses, observers are closely monitoring the legal implications for dog ownership in the UK. The case underscores the ongoing debate about public safety and the need for effective animal control measures.

In the wake of this incident, officials are expected to review existing laws regarding dangerous breeds and consider additional measures to prevent similar tragedies in the future. The kennel owner expressed concern, stating, “I dread the phone ringing,” emphasizing the emotional toll these incidents take on communities.

As discussions continue, the future of XL bully ownership in the UK remains uncertain, with many advocating for stricter regulations to ensure public safety and responsible pet ownership.

The post XL Bully: Tragic Attack Leads to Legal Consequences in the UK appeared first on cottenhamnews.

On March 31, 2026, the tragic death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University has led to significant developments in the ongoing legal case against Tyler Robinson. Just before the incident, Kirk was known for his controversial views and public engagements, making his death a focal point of national attention.

Tyler Robinson, aged 22, has been charged with capital murder for allegedly shooting Kirk. However, the investigation has revealed critical discrepancies in the evidence. Notably, the bullet that killed Kirk did not match the rifle identified as the weapon used by Robinson. The rifle recovered from the scene was a Mauser model 98, which originally fired eight-millimeter cartridges, but the weapon found was a .30-06 caliber rifle.

Robinson’s defense team is preparing to present testimony from an analyst at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to support their claim of his innocence. They have requested a delay of at least six months before the preliminary hearing proceeds, which is currently scheduled for April 17, 2026.

In a concerning twist, DNA analysis has revealed genetic material from multiple individuals on certain evidence items, complicating the prosecution’s case. Furthermore, Robinson allegedly confessed to his father after Kirk’s death, leading to his eventual surrender to law enforcement.

Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Robinson, bolstered by approximately 20,000 electronic files they have provided as evidence. Reports indicate that Robinson expressed his intent to target Kirk due to personal animosity, as he reportedly texted his romantic partner about his motivations.

Erika Kirk, Charlie’s sister, has publicly stated, “We deserve to have cameras in there,” emphasizing the family’s desire for transparency in the legal proceedings. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has expressed his opinion on the case, stating that he hopes “he gets the death penalty.”

As the case unfolds, the implications for those involved are profound. The legal proceedings not only impact Robinson’s future but also resonate deeply within the community and among Kirk’s supporters. The outcome will likely influence discussions surrounding gun violence and public safety.

Robinson is due back in court soon, and as the legal battle intensifies, the focus remains on the evidence and the pursuit of justice for Charlie Kirk. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full scope of evidence and the defense’s strategy.

The post Charlie Kirk’s Tragic Death: Key Developments in the Case Against Tyler Robinson appeared first on cottenhamnews.

What are the implications of the ongoing investigation into Andrew Tate’s handling of sexual abuse allegations? The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is currently investigating the management of these allegations, which involve three women who reported incidents of sexual violence against Tate.

The case, which was closed in 2019 after a four-year investigation, has resurfaced after concerns were raised about the police’s handling of the allegations. A former detective constable and two former detective sergeants are under investigation for gross misconduct related to their alleged failures to investigate the case adequately.

According to reports, Tate is accused of serious offenses, including holding a gun to a woman’s face and making threats. One claimant alleges that Tate assaulted her with a belt and choked her on multiple occasions in 2015. Other alleged victims have claimed that Tate strangled them during sex while making threatening statements.

Despite the severity of the allegations, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided in 2019 and again in 2025 to take no further action due to insufficient evidence. This decision has prompted the alleged victims to take their claims to the High Court, alongside a fourth woman, seeking justice.

The civil trial is scheduled to take place in June 2026 and is expected to last approximately five weeks. The women involved have expressed their gratitude for the IOPC’s investigation, stating, “We are grateful that the IOPC has taken steps to investigate potential issues with how our reports were handled.” They further emphasized, “From the beginning, all we have wanted is for our cases and the evidence to be fully and fairly considered by those with the power to do so.”

Tate’s representatives have denied the allegations, describing them as false and unproven. A spokesperson for Tate stated, “The allegations outlined in the documents are unproven and untested.” This ongoing situation raises critical questions about the support and protection of victims in cases of alleged sexual violence.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full scope of the investigation and its potential outcomes, but the scrutiny of police conduct in this matter is likely to continue as the civil trial approaches.

The post Andrew Tate: Police Watchdog Investigates Handling of Sexual Abuse Allegations appeared first on cottenhamnews.