Key facts:

• Quiz Clothing has operated for 33 years with a total of 40 stores across the UK and seven concessions in Ireland, employing 565 staff.
• The company collapsed owing £40 million.
• Routledges the Bakers had been in operation for nearly 109 years before its closure.
• Routledges cited rising costs as a reason for its closure, facing a financial shortfall of nearly £779,000.

Administrators from Interpath are now managing Quiz Clothing. They anticipate that the administration trading period could last until mid-May 2026. In an immediate impact, 109 redundancies occurred at Quiz Clothing’s head office and distribution center following the announcement.

All branches of Routledges the Bakers across Carlisle have closed after going into liquidation. The company reported an increase of £80,000 in operational costs compared to 2025, contributing to its financial difficulties.

This situation highlights a broader trend within the retail industry, where rising operational costs and changing consumer behaviors continue to challenge long-standing businesses. The closures are part of a growing list of retail collapses as companies struggle to adapt to a rapidly evolving market.

The post Administration appeared first on cottenhamnews.

In a significant escalation of tensions between the government and the press, President Donald Trump threatened to jail a journalist who reported on a missing US airman in Iran. This incident underscores the precarious balance between national security and press freedom, as Trump claimed that the journalist’s reporting endangered the airman and compromised the rescue operation.

During a press conference at the White House, Trump asserted that he would confront the media company that published the information, demanding they reveal their source or face legal consequences. “We are gonna go to the media company that released it and we are going to say ‘national security, give it up or go to jail’,” Trump stated, emphasizing the administration’s stance on protecting sensitive military operations.

The missing airman was successfully rescued after he managed to hide from capture, a mission that involved significant risks and military resources. Trump claimed that the leak of information prompted Iran to offer a reward for capturing the missing pilots, further complicating the situation. He remarked, “They put this mission at great risk,” highlighting the potential dangers posed by the journalist’s report.

Trump’s threats are not unprecedented; he has a history of targeting journalists who publish information he disapproves of. This latest incident adds to a growing list of instances where the President has suggested punitive measures against the press, raising concerns about the implications for press freedom in the United States.

Seth Stern from the Freedom of the Press Foundation defended the journalist’s right to publish government leaks, stating, “Journalists don’t work for the government and their right to publish government leaks is protected by the first amendment.” This statement reflects a broader concern among media advocates regarding the administration’s approach to press relations.

Moreover, Trump has privately expressed dissatisfaction with negative media coverage related to the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran, suggesting that his administration is increasingly sensitive to public perception and media narratives. The President’s remarks during the press conference indicate a willingness to escalate tensions with the media in pursuit of what he perceives as national security interests.

As the situation develops, the White House has not specified which media company Trump was referring to, leaving many questions unanswered. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential legal actions Trump may pursue against the journalist or the media outlet involved.

The implications of this incident extend beyond the immediate threat to the journalist; they raise fundamental questions about the role of the press in a democracy and the extent to which government officials can exert pressure on media organizations. The outcome of this confrontation may set a precedent for future interactions between the government and the press, particularly in matters of national security.

The post Journalist: Donald Trump Threatens Over US Airman Rescue in Iran appeared first on cottenhamnews.

What does the recent attack on journalists in southern Lebanon reveal about the ongoing conflict? On March 19, 2026, Steve Sweeney, the Lebanon bureau chief for Russia Today, was injured by shrapnel from an Israeli air strike while filming in the region.

Sweeney and his cameraman were reportedly wearing clearly marked press gear during the incident, which underscores the risks journalists face in conflict zones. Both were treated for shrapnel wounds in a nearby hospital following the attack.

The Committee to Protect Journalists has called for an investigation into the targeting of journalists, emphasizing that “journalists are civilians and must never be targeted – this is a clear binding legal obligation,” as stated by Sara Qudah, a representative of the organization.

Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT, confirmed the injury of Sweeney, stating, “Our correspondent Steve Sweeney has been wounded by an Israeli strike in Lebanon.” This incident highlights the ongoing dangers faced by journalists in the region, particularly amidst the backdrop of escalating Israeli air strikes and ground operations in southern Lebanon.

According to reports, approximately 200 journalists have been killed in Gaza, with two-thirds of all press killings in 2024 and 2025 attributed to Israel. This alarming statistic raises critical questions about the safety of media personnel in conflict areas.

The Israeli military has stated that it does not target civilians or journalists and operates in accordance with international law. However, the circumstances surrounding the attack on Sweeney and his cameraman have led to widespread concern and condemnation.

Aaron Bastani, a media commentator, remarked, “The only explanation was they were trying to kill a journalist. There’s nothing else there.” This perspective reflects the growing unease regarding the treatment of journalists in conflict zones.

As the situation continues to develop, the international community is left to grapple with the implications of such attacks on press freedom and the safety of journalists worldwide.

Details remain unconfirmed.

The post Steve Sweeney Injured in Israeli Air Strike in Southern Lebanon appeared first on cottenhamnews.