On the evening of October 23, 2023, a fire was reported at The Big Mill on Mill Street in Leek, Staffordshire, at approximately 9:35 PM. The blaze quickly engulfed the entire building, which is a Grade II-listed structure over 165 years old and significant to the local silk industry.

The Big Mill, built in 1860, was one of the earliest large-scale mill buildings in the area. It ceased operations in the 1980s and has remained derelict since 2007. Recently, a planning application was submitted to convert the building into 55 apartments, highlighting its potential for revitalization.

Drone footage captured during the incident revealed the extent of the damage, showing flames consuming the structure and the roof completely collapsed. Fortunately, no injuries were reported as a result of the fire.

An 18-year-old man from Leek has been arrested on suspicion of arson, prompting concerns from local residents about the future of the historic site. One resident lamented, “It’s a shame the councils don’t let them get on and do something with these buildings; they just let them go to rack and ruin. I think there’ll be a lot of sadness because it’s been here so long.”

Dame Karen Bradley, a local MP, expressed her sorrow over the incident, stating, “so sad to see the terrible fire at the Big Mill.” Meanwhile, another local, Cawley, criticized the district council, calling the situation an “absolutely disgrace” that reflects poorly on their management of historic sites.

The Big Mill’s historical significance as an example of large-scale silk industry architecture has been recognized by Historic England, emphasizing the loss felt by the community.

As investigations continue, the future of The Big Mill remains uncertain. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full extent of the damage and the implications for the proposed redevelopment plans.

The post Leek Fire: Blaze Engulfs Historic Big Mill appeared first on cottenhamnews.

Luke Billings, a former technical operator at Nestlé UK, has been awarded £22,216 in compensation after a tribunal ruled his dismissal was unfair. The tribunal found that Billings was terminated for allegedly triggering a fire alarm by vaping in a disabled toilet, a decision that was deemed excessive given the circumstances surrounding his case.

Billings worked at the Nestlé factory in Staffordshire for 10 years before his dismissal in 2023. He had been on long-term sickness absence due to depression from June 2022 until August 2023, shortly before the incident that led to his firing. The tribunal noted that Billings had only recently returned to work on a phased basis when the alleged incident occurred.

The tribunal’s ruling highlighted that the dismissal was primarily based on Billings’s failure to admit wrongdoing and apologise. Judge Ahmed stated, “Failing to apologise or to accept responsibility is not misconduct.” This statement underscored the tribunal’s view that the disciplinary action taken by Nestlé was disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.

Despite the ruling in favour of Billings, the tribunal dismissed his claims of disability discrimination. It concluded that the less favourable treatment he received was not due to his disability but rather because he did not admit his culpability. The judge remarked, “The less favourable treatment was not because of the Claimant’s disability but because he did not admit his culpability and/or apologise.“

During the investigation, Nestlé’s disciplinary officer determined that Billings had indeed triggered the alarm and had been untruthful. However, the tribunal criticized Nestlé for not considering Billings’s long tenure as a mitigating factor. Judge Ahmed noted, “A reasonable employer would consider length of service as a mitigating factor, not a disadvantage.“

Furthermore, the tribunal pointed out that there was no clear rule or warning indicating that vaping in the toilets would be classified as an act of gross misconduct. This lack of clarity contributed to the tribunal’s decision to overturn the dismissal.

Billings’s appeal against his dismissal was upheld, and the tribunal emphasized that the reasons for his dismissal were not adequately substantiated. The tribunal’s ruling serves as a reminder for employers to ensure that disciplinary actions are fair and proportionate, especially in cases involving long-serving employees.

As the situation unfolds, observers are keen to see how Nestlé will respond to the tribunal’s findings and whether any changes will be made to their disciplinary procedures to prevent similar incidents in the future. Details remain unconfirmed.

The post Luke billings nestle tribunal: Luke Billings Nestlé Tribunal Awards £22,216 for Unfair Dismissal appeared first on cottenhamnews.