<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Treasury Articles &amp; Updates - cottenhamnews</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/tag/treasury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>All the News, One Place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>This is money: Stamp Duty for First-Time Buyers:</title>
		<link>https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/this-is-money/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 02:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colleen Babcock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-time buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Emerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightmove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stamp duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/this-is-money/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the end of the stamp duty tax break, first-time buyers in England have faced significant increases in their tax burdens, particularly in London and the southeast.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/this-is-money/">This is money: Stamp Duty for First-Time Buyers:</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thresholds at which stamp duty becomes payable have not risen permanently since their introduction in 2017. This has led to a significant increase in the amount paid by first-time buyers in England, particularly following the end of the tax break in April 2025.</p>
<p>Since that time, first-time buyers have paid a staggering <strong>£408 million</strong> in stamp duty land tax, a sharp rise from <strong>£101 million</strong> in the previous year. The threshold for first-time buyers was lowered from <strong>£425,000</strong> to <strong>£300,000</strong>, further exacerbating the financial burden on new homeowners.</p>
<p>Stamp duty is applicable on properties exceeding a certain threshold, which has not been adjusted since 2017. Currently, just <strong>41%</strong> of homes in England are priced under the first-time buyer threshold, a stark contrast to the <strong>62%</strong> of homes that were available before the tax-free allowance was cut.</p>
<p>More than half of the stamp duty paid by first-time buyers, approximately <strong>53%</strong>, comes from those purchasing properties in London. Buyers in the southeast contributed <strong>23%</strong> of the total stamp duty amount, while those in the northeast accounted for a mere <strong>0.3%</strong>.</p>
<p>Nathan Emerson, a spokesperson for the property industry, stated, &#8220;Stamp duty continues to act as a barrier to entry and wider market movement and should be reviewed.&#8221; This sentiment reflects growing concerns over the accessibility of the housing market for first-time buyers.</p>
<p>Colleen Babcock, another industry expert, noted, &#8220;Far more homes in London and the southeast now sit above the zero-rate limit. This reduces choice and increases the savings needed before buyers can even consider moving.&#8221; This highlights the challenges faced by potential homeowners in these regions.</p>
<p>During the previous lower-rate period, stamp duty was not payable on the first <strong>£250,000</strong> of a property for most homeowners in England. However, the removal of this relief has significantly impacted first-time buyers, particularly those looking at starter homes priced above <strong>£500,000</strong>.</p>
<p>As the market adjusts to these changes, observers are closely monitoring the situation. The Treasury has yet to announce any plans to revise the current thresholds, leaving many first-time buyers in a precarious position as they navigate the increasingly expensive housing market.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/this-is-money/">This is money: Stamp Duty for First-Time Buyers:</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NS&#038;I Premium Bonds Faces £500 Million Missing Payments Issue</title>
		<link>https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-premium-bonds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bereavement claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dax Harkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Savings & Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torsten Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK finance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-premium-bonds/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>National Savings &#038; Investments (NS&#038;I) is facing scrutiny over nearly £500 million owed to bereaved families due to operational failures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-premium-bonds/">NS&#038;I Premium Bonds Faces £500 Million Missing Payments Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<p>National Savings &#038; Investments (NS&#038;I) is currently embroiled in a significant scandal, with reports indicating that the organization owes nearly <strong>£500 million</strong> in missing payments to bereaved families. This alarming situation has emerged as NS&#038;I grapples with the fallout from operational failures that have potentially affected <strong>37,500 bereavement claims</strong>.</p>
<p>The total value of the missing payments is estimated at <strong>£476 million</strong>, raising concerns about the efficiency of NS&#038;I&#8217;s processes. The organization, which serves over <strong>24 million customers</strong> and holds more than <strong>£240 billion</strong> in savings, has faced criticism for its handling of these sensitive cases.</p>
<p>In light of the scandal, NS&#038;I&#8217;s chief executive, <strong>Dax Harkins</strong>, has been replaced, reflecting the seriousness of the situation. The Treasury was notified of the operational failure in December 2025, highlighting the timeline of events leading to this crisis.</p>
<p>Three-quarters of the affected cases relate to the period between 2008 and 2025, indicating a long-standing issue within NS&#038;I&#8217;s operational framework. The organization has since apologized for the errors and poor customer service, acknowledging the distress caused to families during a challenging time.</p>
<p>NS&#038;I is currently undergoing a program aimed at reuniting people with their cash, which has been complicated by the failure to comprehensively trace some customer holdings. The transformation program, which has cost an estimated <strong>£3 billion</strong>, is part of NS&#038;I&#8217;s efforts to rectify these issues.</p>
<p>In 2025 alone, NS&#038;I received <strong>211,800 new bereavement claims</strong>, underscoring the scale of the problem. According to <strong>Torsten Bell</strong>, &#8220;The result of this failure is that not all savings were identified by NS&#038;I and paid to the beneficiaries of their estates as they should have been.&#8221; He further stated, &#8220;There is no need for individuals to waste money on a claims management company or solicitor.&#8221;</p>
<p>An NS&#038;I spokesperson stated, &#8220;We recognise that dealing with bereavement can be challenging and would like to apologise to anyone who has not received the customer service from NS&#038;I that they should expect, particularly at such a sensitive time.&#8221; They added, &#8220;NS&#038;I apologises and is extremely sorry for these errors. It is working hard to ensure everybody affected is paid what is owed to them.&#8221;</p>
<p>As NS&#038;I navigates this crisis, the focus remains on ensuring that all affected families receive the payments they are owed, amidst a backdrop of significant operational challenges.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-premium-bonds/">NS&#038;I Premium Bonds Faces £500 Million Missing Payments Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NS&#038;I Prepares to Compensate 37,000 Customers Over Missing Savings</title>
		<link>https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-prepares-to-compensate-37-000-customers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bereavement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-prepares-to-compensate-37-000-customers/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>National Savings and Investments (NS&#038;I) is preparing to repay hundreds of millions to approximately 37,000 customers due to missing savings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-prepares-to-compensate-37-000-customers/">NS&#038;I Prepares to Compensate 37,000 Customers Over Missing Savings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What the data shows</h2>
<p>What does the recent announcement from National Savings and Investments (NS&#038;I) mean for customers? NS&#038;I is preparing to repay hundreds of millions of pounds to about 37,000 customers over historical failings in compensation related to bereaved families not receiving money that was rightfully theirs. This payout is expected to be the single biggest in NS&#038;I&#8217;s 160-year history.</p>
<p>NS&#038;I has faced significant criticism for a series of errors, including failing to pay out premium bond prizes to deceased savers&#8217; families. The potential compensation amount could be as much as £400 million, raising concerns about the financial implications for taxpayers, as the Treasury provides financial backing for NS&#038;I.</p>
<p>Sir Mel Stride, a prominent figure in the Treasury, has expressed alarm over the situation, stating, &#8220;Hard-working taxpayers could be asked to pick up the bill for what appears to be a staggering failure of oversight.&#8221; He further remarked, &#8220;The idea that £400 million of taxpayers&#8217; cash may now be needed to put right years of mismanagement is deeply alarming.&#8221; This sentiment reflects a growing frustration with the institution&#8217;s handling of customer service, particularly during sensitive times of bereavement.</p>
<p>As NS&#038;I prepares for this unprecedented compensation effort, it is also undergoing a £3 billion modernisation programme that has faced significant scrutiny. Critics have pointed out that while the bank is attempting to modernise, it has simultaneously neglected its existing responsibilities to customers. The bank is also set to cut its premium bond prize rate from 3.6% to 3.3% starting in April, which could further impact customer satisfaction.</p>
<p>In light of these developments, a spokesperson for NS&#038;I stated, &#8220;We recognise that dealing with bereavement can be challenging and would like to apologise to anyone who has not received the customer service from NS&#038;I that they should expect, particularly at such a sensitive time.&#8221; This acknowledgment of past mistakes is a step towards rebuilding trust with affected customers.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, pensions minister Torsten Bell is expected to address the issue in a statement to the House of Commons on Thursday. This forthcoming statement may provide further clarity on the compensation process and the steps NS&#038;I plans to take to rectify its past errors.</p>
<p>However, details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact amount of the payout and how it will be distributed among the affected customers. As the situation develops, stakeholders will be closely monitoring NS&#038;I&#8217;s actions and the government&#8217;s response to this significant financial oversight.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk/ns-i-prepares-to-compensate-37-000-customers/">NS&#038;I Prepares to Compensate 37,000 Customers Over Missing Savings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cottenhamnews.org.uk">cottenhamnews</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
